RESEARCH DESK
A focused reading room for understanding carbon-credit decisions. Reviewed 13 November 2026.
01 / QUALITY
ICVCM sets a credit-quality benchmark. VCMI provides guidance for corporate use and communication. A buyer must evaluate both the unit and its intended use.
Program eligibility should not be read as approval of every category or unit. Confirm the applicable assessment and label status directly.
Read primary source → · Read primary source →02 / TRACEABILITY
Verra’s registry provides project and credit information. Use primary records to investigate identifiers and lifecycle events rather than relying on a marketing description alone.
Buyer practice
Assemble the project ID, serial range, vintage, ownership evidence, beneficiary and retirement record. Resolve inconsistencies before relying on the credit for a claim.
Read primary source →03 / CLAIMS
VCMI’s Claims Code addresses credible use of carbon credits alongside science-aligned emissions cuts. Read the current code and associated assurance guidance at the source.
Editorial interpretation
Keep the emissions inventory, internal reduction progress and external climate finance visible as distinct records. A credit quantity does not itself validate a claim.
Read primary source →04 / PROCUREMENT
Climate Impact Partners describes portfolio planning across credit types and buyer priorities. Respira describes longer-term arrangements with project developers.
Editorial interpretation
Nearer-term sourcing and future commitments answer different needs. Before signing, review delivery milestones, verification dependencies, replacement terms, payment schedule and counterparty risk. The planner illustrates costs only.
Read primary source → · Read primary source →05 / GOVERNANCE · 2 SEPTEMBER 2026
South Pole reports KPMG assurance over its Quality Management Framework controls. This is a company announcement about a specific assurance scope, rather than a guarantee of all project outcomes.
Buyer practice
Request the actual assurance scope and date. Check what was assessed and what remains a separate project-level decision.
Read primary source →SOURCE LEDGER
Undated; checked 13 November 2026
Supply-side quality benchmark; program and category assessment are distinct from a blanket endorsement of every credit.
Current page checked 13 November 2026
Demand-side guidance for credible corporate use and communication of carbon credits alongside emissions cuts.
Undated; checked 13 November 2026
Public registry information and credit lifecycle records.
Undated; checked 13 November 2026
Standards and methodologies for measuring climate and sustainable-development impact.
Undated; checked 13 November 2026
Portfolio construction balances project characteristics, commercial constraints and changing needs.
2 September 2026
Company reports KPMG assurance of its framework controls; this is not assurance that every project outcome is guaranteed.
Undated; checked 13 November 2026
Describes fixed-price long-term contracts and project-finance support.
Undated; checked 13 November 2026
A credit represents one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent reduction or removal.
Primary sources only. Corporate descriptions are attributed, not independently audited here. No market-size forecast, live price series, project certification or investment recommendation is asserted. Undated pages use a verification date, not an invented publication date.